The Alliance for Renewable Energy’s mission is to build support in North America for bold, proven, renewable energy policies that will rapidly increase our shift from fossil fuels to decentralized, clean, renewable energy. These policies call for 15-20 year contracts, with set rates and no limit on production, between all renewable energy producers and buyers.
Jennifer Gleason of ELAW (Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide), and the Alliance for Renewable Energy has finished two exceptional papers on the issues of state level Feed-in Tariffs.
The first paper, Adopting State Feed-in Tariff Laws without Federal Preemption is intended to help renewable energy advocates understand the concerns about federal preemption and understand possible paths forward for states to adopt robust FITs that are not preempted.
The second, accompanying paper Available Paths for Designing Strong State Feed in Tariffs is intended to provide sample language that could be used by states to implement a Feed-in Tariff that should not be preempted by federal law. This language only addresses how the rates would be set.
The Los Angeles Business Council (LABC) today released a
report calling for a modest solar photovoltaic (PV) feed-in tariff
program in the City of Angels.
The second of two reports by UCLA's Luskin Center lays out a detailed
economic proposal for creating a multi-tiered system of feed-in tariffs
(FIT) for solar PV that would result in 600 MW of solar PV within ten
years.
The proposal's limited objective will contribute to only 3% the city's
electricity supply in 2020. Further, LABC's proposal considers only
solar PV and not any other form of renewable energy.
In a dramatic display of the power feed-in tariffs have in driving
markets, Italy installed more solar photovoltaics (PV) in 2009 than the
entire US. Moreover, within the first quarter of 2010, Italy's total
installed solar PV capacity was expected to exceed that of the US.
Italy installed 720 MW of solar PV in 2009, nearly all of that on
rooftops. In contrast, the US installed 435 MW during the same period,
according to a draft report by the Interstate Renewable Energy Council
(IREC).
Italy introduced a system of feed-in tariffs for solar PV in February,
2007 after concluding that the previous program of Tradable Green
Certificates was not delivering the results desired.
By the end of 2007, Italy had installed five times more solar PV than in
the previous year. Despite numerous bureaucratic roadblocks, the solar
industry took off in 2008 and installed nearly 350 MW, then a
record-breaking number. Solar PV installations have been doubling since
then and are expected to reach 1,500 MW in 2010.
The World Future Council has issued a report grading North American
feed-in tariffs for renewable energy. Only Ontario and Vermont make a
passing grade. All other programs in the US and Canada failed to pass.
Gipe evaluated the programs using ten criteria that have been
found critical in creating successful renewable energy policy. He then
devised a weighting system to reflect the relative importance of each
criterion. Most criteria received 10 points, some less. Tariff
differentiation by size or application, a hallmark of successful
programs, received 20 points.
Program caps, 10 points
Project size caps, 10 points
Contract terms, 10 points
Technologies included, 10 points
Tariffs based on cost of generation, 10 points
Tariffs differentiated by technology, 10 points
Tariffs differentiated by size or application for each technology, 20 points
Tariffs differentiated by resource intensity for wind energy, 10 points
Pacific Environment, the World Future Council, the Boell Foundation and othersare
hosting a one-day conference titled “Feed-in Tariffs: A Time for Real
Action on Renewable Energy.” The event will be held in San Francisco on
July 12, 2010 to discuss the rapid deployment of renewable energy in
the U.S. using Feed-in Tariffs (FiT), a policy mechanism that has been
successfully implemented in Europe and other areas of the world.
Focusing mainly on California and the West Coast, industry experts from
government, business, and the environmental field will discuss Feed-in
Tariffs as a policy option, and as a way to stimulate investment in
renewable energy, increase energy security and promote economic
development inCalifornia.
Key objectives of the conference include:
Increasing
understanding of Feed-in Tariffs (FiT), including their significant
potential to address climate change, create new jobs and rapidly
develop renewable energy
Discussing
how to draft and implement renewable energy laws in the United States,
with a focus on California and the West Coast, looking specifically at
Feed-in Tariffs
Developing political strategies for implementing robust Feed-in Tariffs
Contrary to what some commentators are saying, Oregon did not just adopt
a feed-in tariff (FIT). ELAW has been working diligently to ensure
that Oregon adopts a FIT because FITs have been proven to be the most
effective and efficient means of moving renewables onto the grid. Sadly,
Oregon’s program falls far short of the mark.
Renewable energy businesses and activists
entered the month of April with high hopes of seeing the State Legislature
pass the Clean Energy Jobs Act (CEJA), a comprehensive bill designed
to propel Wisconsin toward energy independence, along the way creating
thousands of new jobs and strengthening the sustainable energy marketplace.
This comprehensive bill would have raised the renewable energy content
of electricity sold in Wisconsin, while stepping up ratepayer support
for smaller-scale renewable energy installations throughout the state.
Unfortunately, on April 22, the State
Senate adjourned for the year without taking action on the Clean Energy
Jobs Act bill, effectively killing the measure and leaving hundreds
of businesses and individuals who campaigned for the bill empty-handed.
If life imitates poetry, then the line
that opens T.S. Eliot’s “The Waste Land—“April is the cruelest
month”—aptly encapsulates the evolution of a campaign that overcame
many obstacles in the final weeks only to be undermined by the unwillingness
of Senate leaders to schedule a vote on the bill.
The
following is a list of many of the FIT related activities that ARE Steering
Committee members participated in, or were instrumental in bringing about in
2009 and from January through April 2010.